The 1990 federal Clean Air Act revised the planning
requirements for many areas that have not attained National Ambient
Air Quality Standards. The South Coast Air Quality Management
District (District) has jurisdiction over the South Coast Air
Basin (Basin), and the desert portions of Los Angeles and Riverside
counties in the Mojave Desert Air Basin and Salton Sea Air Basin,
respectively (see Figure 1-1). However, AB 2666 (Knight) created
the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District beginning on
July 1, 1997. Until then, the District will continue to address
the planning requirements for the Antelope Valley. The Antelope
Valley, located in the desert portion of Los Angeles county, and
the Coachella Valley, located in the desert portion of Riverside
county, both exceed the federal ozone standard. The Antelope Valley
is unclassified for PM10. The Coachella Valley has attained the
federal PM10 standards and a maintenance plan is currently being
developed as a separate plan.
The federal Clean Air Act requires that the Antelope Valley and
Coachella Valley:
- identify specific emission reduction goals;
- demonstrate reasonable further progress in VOC emission reductions;
- demonstrate attainment of the federal ozone standard by November
15, 2007; and
- provide contingency measures or actions in the event of a
failure to attain or to meet interim milestones.
This AQMP revision addresses these requirements and satisfies
the State Implementation Plan requirements under Title I of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
There are a number of circumstances that are unique to the Antelope
and Coachella valleys which make it difficult to develop a local
control strategy that satisfies CAA requirements. For example,
with little in the way of local emissions, and with the significant
growth projected for both desert areas it is difficult to satisfy
the reasonable further progress requirements of the CAA. There
is strong evidence that pollutant transport from the South Coast
Air Basin to the Antelope and Coachella valleys is the primary
cause of the ozone nonattainment status of both areas. As a result,
the District believes that aggressive control of the South Coast
Air Basin emissions is an effective strategy to substantially
improve air quality in the Antelope and Coachella valleys. Each
of these issues is addressed in further detail below.
Regulatory
Requirements
State Implementation Plan requirements under Title I of the CAA
depend on the severity of the nonattainment problem. For the Antelope
Valley and the Coachella Valley, the CAA requirements for moderate
through severe areas must be addressed. Thus, the areas are subject
to the reasonable further progress requirements of the CAA, as
discussed in Chapter 6 for the South Coast Air Basin; these requirements
are intended to ensure that each ozone nonattainment area provide
for sufficient VOC emission reductions to attain the ozone national
ambient air quality standard. These requirements are more difficult
to meet for areas with low existing emissions and significant
population growth, since the VOC reductions are relative to the
1990 emissions and activity levels. For example, the CAA requires
three percent VOC emission reductions beginning in 1997. If an
area experiences population growth such that VOC emissions increase
by 15 percent over 1990 levels, then the area must develop regulations
that achieve VOC reductions of at least 18 percent (i.e., the
3 percent rate-of-progress requirement plus the 15 percent increase
from population growth). The expected population growth for the
Antelope and Coachella valleys is significant; thus the rate-of-progress
requirements of the CAA cannot be met for either area unless further
local controls are implemented.
The CAA also requires that "severe-17" ozone nonattainment
areas, such as the Antelope and Coachella valleys, demonstrate
attainment of the federal ozone air quality standard by November
15, 2007 using a U.S. EPA-recommended photochemical grid model
and EPA-approved modeling techniques. The South Coast Air Basin
modeling domain, as shown in Figure 8-1, was expanded to include
the Antelope Valley and Coachella Valley so that this CAA requirement
could be addressed. It is clear from available data that federal
ozone standard exceedances in the Antelope and Coachella valleys
largely result from pollutant transport from the upwind South
Coast Air Basin. Photochemical grid modeling for the 1994 AQMP,
using the U.S. EPA-approved Urban Airshed Model, shows that attainment
of the ozone standard is possible with the proposed control strategy
described in the 1994 AQMP for the South Coast Air Basin, and
control of locally generated emissions via state and federal regulations.
This Plan carries forward the 1994 AQMP control approach for the
Antelope and Coachella valleys.
Population
Growth
Both the Antelope Valley and the Coachella Valley are rapidly
growing areas, as shown in Table 8-1. By 2020, the population
in the Antelope Valley is expected to nearly triple from 1990
levels and the Coachella Valley population is projected to more
than double. It is clearly more challenging to meet the rate-of-progress
requirements of the CAA in such rapidly growing areas.
FIGURE 8-1

Modeling Domain
[Note: A New District (Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District)
was Formed in September 1996 and Will Be Effective on July 1,
1997.]
TABLE 8-1
Historical Population and Population Forecasts
Area 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
South Coast Air ~10,500,000 13,022,000 14,798,000 16,653,000 18,926,000
Basin
Antelope Valley 101,000 235,000
375,000 532,000 706,000
Coachella Valley 139,000 267,000
319,000 389,000 475,000
Pollutant
Transport
The following pollutant transport pathways from the South Coast
Air Basin to the Mojave Desert and Salton Sea air basins have
been identified: 1) through Newhall Pass to the Antelope Valley;
and 2) through Banning Pass to the Coachella Valley. The transport
pathway to the Coachella Valley has been an intensely studied
phenomenon. An experiment to study this transport pathway concluded
that the South Coast Air Basin was the source of the observed
high oxidant levels in the Coachella Valley. Transport from Anaheim
to Palm Springs was directly identified with an inert sulfur hexafluoride
tracer release. The most comprehensive study to date of transport
from the South Coast Air Basin to the Mojave Desert and Salton
Sea air basins confirmed the transport pathways to both Antelope
and Coachella valleys.
Ozone pollutant transport to the Antelope and Coachella valleys
can be demonstrated by examining ozone exceedance frequencies
as a function of distance from the source areas. Figures 8-2 and
8-3, respectively, show the frequency of exceedances of the federal
one-hour ozone standard by hour for the period 1991 to 1995. Figure
8-2 represents the transport route to the Antelope Valley beginning
at the primary source region of downtown Los Angeles through Burbank
and Santa Clarita and ending at Lancaster in the Antelope Valley.
The Coachella Valley transport route is represented in Figure
8-3, starting at Pico Rivera near the source region and passing
through Fontana and Banning and finally through Banning Pass to
Palm Springs in the Coachella Valley. Note in both figures that
near the source region exceedances occur most frequently at mid-day
(noon to 1:00 p.m.) during the peak of incoming solar radiation
and therefore the peak of ozone production. As one goes downwind
of the source region, exceedances occur later and later in the
day as the ozone cloud is transported downwind. For example, at
Lancaster exceedances occur most frequently at 3:00 to 4:00 p.m.
and Palm Springs exceedances occur most frequently at 6:00 p.m.
If these peaks were locally generated they would be occurring
near mid-day and not in the late afternoon or early evening.
FIGURE 8-2

Frequency of Federal Ozone Exceedances Along the Antelope Valley
Transport Route,
1991-95
Ozone is transported these long distances at fairly high concentrations
for two reasons. Control of VOCs in the South Coast Air Basin
has caused the location of the daily maximum ozone to move eastward;
thus more pollutants which have not reacted are carried to greater
distances. The VOC control program in the South Coast Air Basin
has reduced VOC emissions to the extent that photochemical reaction
rates of formation of ozone have also slowed. Greater amounts
of emissions (although, overall, these emissions are lower) are
transported downwind as a result. In addition, ozone formed in
the South Coast Air Basin could remain above the standards during
transport in the downwind areas since there are fewer oxides of
nitrogen sources to react with ozone during the nighttime hours.
Table 8-2 compares the 1993 emission inventories of the South
Coast Air Basin with those for the Antelope Valley and the Coachella
Valley. The South Coast Air Basin emissions, upwind of the Antelope
and Coachella valleys, overwhelm the locally-generated emissions.
Depending on the pollutant, emissions in the South Coast Air Basin
are 11 (for PM10) to 99 (for SOx) times greater than emissions
in the Antelope Valley and 5 (for PM10) to 50 (for SOx) times
greater than emissions in the Coachella Valley. It is clear that
improved air quality in these areas depends on reduced emissions
in the South Coast Air Basin. This is illustrated by the trends
in ozone air quality described in the following section.
FIGURE 8-3

Frequency of Federal Ozone Exceedances Along the Coachella Valley
Transport Route, 1991-95
TABLE 8-2
Comparison of 1993 Annual Average Emissions
Emission Rate
(tons/day)
Area VOC NOx CO SOx PM10
South Coast Air 1239 1194 7045 79 416
Basin
Antelope Valley 28 30 168 1 28
Coachella Valley 40 54 270 1 88
Trends in Ozone Air Quality
Ozone air quality trends since 1980 are shown in Figures 8-4 and
8-5 for stations along the Antelope and Coachella Valley transport
routes, respectively. The statistic used here to illustrate trends
is the average of the 30 highest daily maximum one-hour ozone
concentrations in each year, referred to as the "Top 30 Mean."
This statistic has been identified and recommended by the ARB
as a good trend indicator. Over this time period population growth
in the Antelope and Coachella valleys was much greater than that
in the South Coast Air Basin, as shown in Table 8-2. Since emissions
are directly related to population for many source categories,
emissions growth was also greater in the Antelope and Coachella
valleys relative to the South Coast Air Basin. However, the downward
trend in the Top 30 Means at Lancaster and Palm Springs parallels
the trend of the upwind stations which are in the South Coast
Air Basin. This observation confirms the conclusion that ozone
air quality in the Antelope and Coachella valleys is largely due
to transport from the upwind source region of the South Coast
Air Basin and that attainment in the valleys is only possible
with emission reductions in the Basin.
FIGURE 8-4

Mean of the Top 30 Daily Peak Ozone Concentrations - Antelope
Valley Transport Route
FIGURE 8-5

Mean of the Top 30 Daily Peak Ozone Concentrations - Coachella
Valley Transport Route
Figures 8-6 and 8-7 illustrate just how effective the District's
control strategy has been in reducing the number of federal one-hour
ozone exceedances in the Antelope and Coachella valleys since
1980. The number of exceedance days by month in 1980, 1985, 1990,
and 1995 for Lancaster and Palm Springs are shown in Figures 8-6
and 8-7, respectively. Both the number of days per month exceeding
the standard and the number of months in which exceedances are
observed have dropped dramatically since 1980. In 1980, Lancaster
experienced exceedances in eight months of the year and Palm Springs
experienced exceedances in seven months of the year. By 1995,
the number of months with exceedances had dropped to only three
months.
FIGURE 8-6

Federal Exceedance Days by Month and Year at Lancaster
FIGURE 8-7

Federal Exceedance Days by Month and Year at Palm Springs
Air quality modeling is an integral part of the planning process
to achieve clean air. The CAA requires that ozone nonattainment
areas designated as serious and above be required to use a photochemical
grid model to demonstrate attainment. The photochemical grid model
(or air quality simulation model) recommended by the U.S. EPA
for ozone analyses is the Urban Airshed Model with the Carbon
Bond Mechanism IV chemistry (UAM). UAM is an urban-scale, three-dimensional,
grid-type, numerical simulation model. It is designed for computing
ozone concentrations under short-term, episodic conditions lasting
one to three days. UAM is also the recommended model for ozone
analysis by the ARB.
It is desirable to perform ozone air quality analyses using several
different meteorological episodes. Chapter 5 describes the meteorological
episodes used to project future air quality. Performance evaluations
of the four meteorological episodes are discussed in Technical
Report V-B of the 1994 AQMP.
Future-year air quality projections in the Antelope and Coachella
valleys are presented in detail in Appendix V; the results are
summarized in Figure 8-8 for the Antelope Valley and Figure 8-9
for the Coachella Valley. The peak predicted ozone concentrations
are shown for the baseline and controlled 2007 simulations for
each of the four meteorological episodes modeled. "Baseline"
assumes no further control beyond existing rules and regulations
and "Control" assumes implementation of the proposed
control strategy described in Chapters 4 and 7. As illustrated,
the federal ozone standard, shown by a solid horizontal line at
12 pphm in the figures, will be exceeded in one of the four episodes
in the Antelope Valley and in two of the four episodes in the
Coachella Valley if the AQMP control is not implemented. However,
with the implementation of the control strategy, the federal one-hour
ozone air quality standard is attained for all four episodes in
both the Antelope and Coachella valleys.
FIGURE 8-8

Maximum Predicted Ozone Concentrations for 2007 in the Antelope
Valley With and Without Implementation of the 1997 AQMP Control
Strategy
The reasonable further progress requirements in the CAA are intended
to ensure that each ozone nonattainment area provide for sufficient
precursor emission reductions to attain the ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard. More specifically, Section 182(c)(2) requires
that each serious and above ozone nonattainment area achieve actual
VOC emission reductions of at least three percent per year averaged
over each consecutive 3-year period beginning six years after
enactment of the Act until the area's attainment date (i.e., November
15, 2007 for the Antelope and Coachella valleys). This is called
the "post-1996 rate-of-progress" requirement of the
CAA.
FIGURE 8-9

Maximum Predicted Ozone Concentrations for 2007 in the Coachella
Valley With and Without Implementation of the 1997 AQMP Control
Strategy
According to Section 182(c)(2)(C), actual NOx emission reductions
which occur after 1990 can be used to meet post-1996 VOC emission
reduction requirements provided the NOx reductions satisfy the
following criteria. First, the control strategy used to demonstrate
attainment must consist of both VOC and NOx control measures.
More specifically, the mix of VOC and NOx emission reductions
used to satisfy the post-1996 rate-of-progress requirements of
the CAA must be consistent with the controlled VOC and NOx emission
levels used in the modeling demonstration. And lastly, the combined
annual VOC and NOx reductions must average 3 percent per year.
As mentioned a number of times in this
chapter, poor ozone air quality in the Antelope and Coachella
valleys is primarily due to transport of ozone and its precursors
from the upwind source region of the South Coast Air Basin and
attainment in these downwind valleys is only possible with substantial
emission reductions in the Basin. With this in mind, the proposed
control strategy consists of two components: 1) an aggressive
control strategy for VOC and NOx emission sources in the South
Coast Air Basin; and 2) control of locally generated emissions
via proposed control measures implemented by state and federal
actions.
The District's approach to satisfying the post-1996 rate-of-progress
requirement is presented in Appendix V; Figures 8-10 (Antelope
Valley) and 8-11 (Coachella Valley) summarize the results. At
each milestone year (1999, 2002, 2005, and 2007) the following
VOC and NOx emission levels are shown:
- the target level (termed "Target Level" in the figures);
- the projected uncontrolled baseline (termed "Projected
Baseline" in the figures); and
- the controlled emissions - statewide mobile and stationary
control measures and control measures for federally regulated
sources (termed "Controlled Emissions" in the figures).
The rate-of-progress results for the Antelope Valley are shown
in Figure 8-10. The proposed reduction rates by milestone year
are shown in Table 8-3. These rates were determined by applying
all the creditable VOC reductions at each milestone and providing
sufficient NOx reductions to satisfy the VOC emission reduction
requirements of Section 182(c)(2). Comparing the baseline emissions
with the target levels for each milestone year indicates that
additional emission reductions are necessary to achieve target
levels as illustrated in Figure 8-10. However, with the implementation
of the state and federal control measures, the post-1996 rate-of-progress
requirements are satisfied at all milestone years as shown by
the controlled emission levels in Figure 8-10.
TABLE 8-3
Percent VOC and NOx Reductions for the
Antelope Valley Post-1996 Rate of Progress Plan
Milestone Year VOC NOx CAA*
1999 15.0 9.0 24.0
2002 0.5 8.5 9.0
2005 5.0 4.0 9.0
2007 0.5 5.5 6.0
* The percent VOC and NOx reductions must equal the CAA percent
reduction requirements listed here.
FIGURE 8-10

Comparison of Baseline and Controlled (a) VOC and (b) NOx Emissions
and CAA Target Levels - Antelope Valley
As shown in Figure 8-11, the VOC and NOx emission reductions from
existing District and ARB rules are sufficient to meet the CAA
rate-of-progress requirements for the Coachella Valley. The rate-of-progress
requirements for all milestone years are met by a combination
of VOC and NOx reductions from existing District and ARB rules.
The proposed reduction rates by milestone year are shown in Table
8-4. The control strategy provides additional VOC and NOx reductions
for all the years beginning with 1999. The projected emission
reductions beyond the target levels can be used as contingency
in the event of a milestone failure.
TABLE 8-4
Percent VOC and NOx Reductions for the
Coachella Valley Post-1996 Rate of Progress Plan
Milestone Year VOC NOx CAA*
1999 16.3 7.7 24.0
2002 6.5 2.5 9.0
2005 6.4 2.6 9.0
2007 3.0 3.0 6.0
* The percent VOC and NOx reductions must equal the CAA percent
reduction requirements listed here.
FIGURE 8-11

Comparison of Baseline and Controlled (a) VOC and (b) NOx Emissions
and CAA Target Levels - Coachella Valley
Introduction
The Coachella Valley is currently designated nonattainment for
PM10. Unlike the Basin, where PM10 exceedances are due primarily
to PM10 precursor pollutants, the Coachella Valley's elevated
PM10 levels are strongly tied to local fugitive dust problems.
Accordingly, instead of relying on District rulemaking to achieve
attainment, previous planning documents have proposed local control
to meet the area's air quality objectives. This approach allows
local Coachella Valley governments, industry, and citizens to
take an active part in improving the Valley's air quality. As
a result of this approach, various local dust control programs
and two District "backstop" rules have been developed.
These programs have resulted in significant improvements in the
Valley's air quality.
Background
Under the 1990 federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the Coachella Valley
was originally designated as a "moderate" PM10 nonattainment
area. In response to CAA requirements for "moderate"
areas, the District developed the "State Implementation Plan
for PM10 in the Coachella Valley" (90-CVSIP) which was adopted
by the Governing Board in November 1990. The 90-CVSIP proposed
implementation of reasonably available control measures (RACM)
for fugitive dust sources no later than December 10, 1993. Modeling
contained in the 90-CVSIP demonstrated attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for PM10 would occur by
December 31, 1995, one year after the statutory limit for moderate
nonattainment areas.
The CAA specifies that any area which cannot attain the standards
by December 1994 would subsequently be reclassified as a "serious"
nonattainment area. In January 1993, the U.S. EPA completed its
initial redesignation process, and included the Coachella Valley
among five nationwide areas redesignated as "serious,"
effective February 8, 1993. The CAA further specifies that a SIP
revision is due within 18 months of the redesignation date (i.e.,
August 8, 1994) and that a demonstration of attainment must be
submitted within four years of the redesignation date (i.e., February
8, 1997). Among other requirements, the "serious" area
SIP must ensure the implementation of "best available control
measures" (BACM). The District prepared and later adopted
the 1994 Coachella Valley PM10 SIP revision (94-CVSIP) in July
of 1994.
1997 PM10 Maintenance Plan
Under the CAA, an area can be redesignated as attainment if, among
other requirements, the U.S. EPA determines that the NAAQS have
been attained. Section 175A of the CAA states that any district
that submits a request under Section 107(d) for redesignation
of a nonattainment area to attainment must submit a revision of
the applicable SIP that demonstrates attainment for at least 10
years after the redesignation. U.S. EPA guidance states that a
determination of compliance with the NAAQS must be based on three
complete, consecutive calendar years of quality-assured air quality
monitoring data. Air quality is monitored at two locations in
the Coachella Valley and results indicate that there were no PM10
exceedances in 1993 or 1994. In 1995, the 24-hour standard was
exceeded once and this led to an exceedance of the annual average
standard. This exceedance occurred on a day where the maximum
hourly wind gusts exceeded 50 mph for each hour of the day.
The U.S. EPA has recently developed a natural events policy that
permits, under certain circumstances, the exclusion of air quality
data attributable to uncontrollable natural events (e.g., volcanic
activity, wildland fires, and high wind events). With the exclusion
of air quality data from the one 24-hour exceedance in 1995, the
Coachella Valley has experienced three consecutive years without
an exceedance of the PM10 standards and, consequently, would be
eligible for redesignation to attainment. Based on the supporting
meteorological data regarding the one high wind event in 1995,
the District is preparing a maintenance plan for the Coachella
Valley. In accordance with U.S. EPA guidance, the major elements
of the plan are as follows:
- a demonstration of attainment with the PM10 standards based
on the three most recent years of ambient data;
- a maintenance plan, including contingency measures, to ensure
continued attainment for the next ten years; and
- a Natural Events Action Plan pursuant to the Natural Events
Policy.
The Coachella Valley Maintenance plan will be prepared as a separate
document. It will be released for public review and submitted
to the U.S. EPA in lieu of the attainment demonstration prior
to February 8, 1997.
The Antelope Valley and the Coachella Valley are designated as
"severe-17" ozone nonattainment areas and as such must
demonstrate reasonable further progress and attainment according
to federal Clean Air Act requirements. The District's proposed
control strategy includes two components: a strategy for the South
Coast Air Basin as described in Chapter 4 and control of locally
generated emissions in the Antelope Valley and Coachella Valley
via regulations at the state and federal level. Photochemical
grid modeling, using a U.S. EPA-approved model and methodologies,
demonstrates that the federal one-hour ozone standard will be
met by November 15, 2007 for the Coachella Valley as required
by the CAA. However, the federal ozone air quality standard will
be met in the Antelope Valley by 2010. For PM10, the Antelope
Valley is an unclassified area with no current planning requirements;
for the Coachella Valley, a PM10 maintenance plan will be submitted
with a request to U.S. EPA for redesignation to attainment status.
|