REPORT:
First Annual Program Review for Rule 2020 – RECLAIM Reserve
SYNOPSIS:
Rule 2020 – RECLAIM Reserve, requires an annual report to the Board on
several implementation aspects of the rule. The report includes specifics
on projects under the Pilot Credit Generation Rules that provide emission
reductions for the RECLAIM AQIP and Mitigation Fee Program. It also
includes an evaluation of the Rule 2020 participation fee and information
on credits received and used for the RECLAIM AQIP, Mitigation Fee Program,
and the State Emission Reduction Credit Bank. This report, in conjunction
with the Status Report on Mobile Source Credit Generation Rules and
Chapter 3 of the Annual RECLAIM Audit Report for 2000 Compliance Year
presented to the Board on March 1, 2002, fully satisfies the requirements
of Rule 2020.
COMMITTEES:
Stationary Source and Mobile Source, March 22, 2002, Reviewed
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Receive and file.
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env.
Executive Officer
Executive Summary
Rule 2020 – RECLAIM Reserve, was adopted as part of the RECLAIM program
changes in May 2001 to address California energy issues and the rapid rise
in NOx RECLAIM Trading Credit (RTCs) prices. The rule, along with five
credit generation rules, set up new credit programs to assist certain
RECLAIM facilities in complying with their annual allocations. Rule 2020
requires an annual progress report to the Board on these programs. This
report, along with the Status Report on Mobile Source Credit Generation
Rules and Chapter 3 of the Annual RECLAIM Audit Report for 2000 Compliance
Year presented to the Board on March 1, 2002, fulfills that requirement.
The RECLAIM Air Quality Investment Program (AQIP) was designed to help
new1 and small emitting RECLAIM
facilities comply with their allocations. Mobile or area source credits
generated under the pilot credit generation rules will be converted to RTCs
for use by these facilities. The Mitigation Fee Program was designed to help
power producers offset their excess NOx emissions due to the California
energy crisis. Since May 2001, two marine vessel repowering projects have
been undertaken to generate emission reductions for the RECLAIM AQIP and
Mitigation Fee Program. The initial projects are nearing completion.
Emission reductions will be generated over several years with the first
reductions expected to be available as early as spring 2002. Emission
reductions under both programs can be purchased for $7.50 per pound while
the cost-effectiveness for both projects is below that cost. Therefore, no
change in the RECLAIM Reserve participation fee is recommended at this time.
1 A new facility
is defined as any facility which has received all District Permits to
Construct on or after October 15, 1993 (Rule 2000(c)(51)).
The State Emission Reduction Credit Bank was established by two of
Governor Davis’ Executive Orders in early 2001 to provide offsets for new or
expanded natural gas peaking capacity at power plants. These emission
reductions were obtainable until September 30, 2001. Three facilities used
this program. Two were RECLAIM facilities and one was non-RECLAIM. A total
of 55 pounds per day of PM10 and 1,081 pound per day of NOx emission
reductions were obtained from the state bank.
Background
Rule 2020 was adopted in May 2001 as part of the amendments to the
RECLAIM program undertaken to address the rapid rise in NOx RTCs and
California energy issues. It set up the procedures and fees for generators
and users of NOx emission reductions for the RECLAIM AQIP, the Mitigation
Fee Program, and natural gas turbine power plant peaking sources. Five pilot
credit generation rules were also adopted at that time to generate NOx
emission reductions for the RECLAIM Reserve. They include Rules 1612.1 –
Mobile Source Credit Generation Pilot Program, 1631 – Pilot Credit
Generation Program for Marine Vessels, 1632 – Pilot Credit Generation
Program for Hotelling Operations, 1633 – Pilot Credit Generation Program for
Truck/Trailer Refrigeration Units, and 2507 – Pilot Credit Generation
Program for Agricultural Pumps which have been approved by EPA for inclusion
in the State Implementation Plan. A sixth rule, Rule 1634 – Pilot Credit
Generation Program for Truck Stops, adopted in 2001, has not yet been
approved by EPA. Rule 2020 requires an annual report to the Board including:
- The amount of NOx emission reductions that have been generated over
the past 12 months, that have been obtained, and that remain in the
Reserve;
- The number and types of facilities, including location, that have
participated in the RECLAIM AQIP and Mitigation Fee Program;
- A description of the types of emission reduction control strategy
projects that have been or are being implemented under the Pilot Credit
Generation rules;
- The location of the emission reduction control strategy projects;
- An evaluation of the participation fee; and
- For the State Emission Reduction Credit Bank:
- The amount of credits converted to RTCs;
- The amount of credits used at non-RECLAIM facilities; and
- The number of gas turbines, including location, capacity, date of
operation, and projected and actual emissions, if available.
The March 21, 2002 Status Report on Mobile Source Credit Generation Rules
and Chapter 3 of the Annual RECLAIM Audit Report for 2000 Compliance Year
partially fulfilled these requirements. All information from the two reports
has been included and updated in this report.
NOx Emission Reductions
During the past 12 months two projects have been funded to generate
credits under Rule 1631 – Mobile Source Credit Generation Pilot Program for
Marine Vessels, but no emission reductions have yet been obtained for the
RECLAIM Reserve. These credits will be generated over time based on fuel
usage and the first of the credits will be available as early as spring
2002. Therefore, the current balance in the Reserve is zero.
Facilities Participating in RECLAIM AQIP and the Mitigation Fee
Program
RECLAIM AQIP is designed to convert mobile source or area source emission
reductions from approved projects to RTCs. The RTCs can then be purchased by
qualified facilities to offset emissions in excess of their annual
allocations. Facilities allowed to use RECLAIM AQIP include new or low
emitters (i.e., 6 tons per year or less of NOx) that meet certain criteria.
RECLAIM AQIP requires pre-funding and emission reductions are not yet
available for the program. Therefore, at this time, there are no
participants. Some emission reductions from current projects will be
available as early as spring 2002.
In contrast to the RECLAIM AQIP, the Mitigation Fee Program does not
require pre-funding. Power producing facilities pay $7.50 per pound for
emission reductions to offset excess emissions. Since May 2001, five
facilities have participated in the Mitigation Fee Program. The total amount
collected under the Rule 2020 Mitigation Fee Program is approximately $14.7
million. Additional money has been collected under the Mitigation Fee
Program established by Governor Davis’ Executive Order No. D-24-01 dated
January 17, 2001. Table I summarizes the facilities that paid into the
mitigation fee during 2001.
Table I
Rule 2020 Mitigation Fee Program Participants in 2001
|
Facility |
Facility Type |
Location |
| 1 |
Electric Power Producer
|
Redondo Beach |
| 2 |
Electric Power Producer
|
Long Beach |
| 3 |
Electric Power Producer
|
Huntington Beach |
| 4 |
Electric Power Producer
|
Etiwanda |
| 5 |
Electric Power Producer
|
Burbank |
Past and Current Emission Reduction Control Strategies
Two emission reduction control strategies have been funded under Rule
1631. Both projects are repowering marine vessels. One consists of
repowering three vessels for the RECLAIM AQIP, with total projected emission
reductions of 640 tons. The second project’s emission reductions will be
included in the Mitigation Fee Program and consists of repowering 33 vessels
with projected total emission reductions of 610 tons. These emission
reductions have been revised since the March 2002 Status Report on Mobile
Source Credit Generation Rules due to additional information from source
testing of the engines and moving one of the vessels from the Mitigation Fee
Project to the RECLAIM AQIP project. The emission reductions are generated
over time and calculated based on the fuel usage for the boats. Most of the
repowering projects have been completed and the first emission reductions
may be available as early as spring 2002 through June 30, 2005. All marine
vessels for the projects are located at the Ports of Long Beach and Los
Angeles. Additional projects will be funded in the near future to use the
additional money collected under the Mitigation Fee Program.
To date, no projects have been funded under the other pilot rules.
Evaluation of the Participation Fee
The current participation fee for the RECLAIM Reserve is $7.50 per pound
of emission reductions. The projects undertaken so far are below $7.50 per
pound. However, projects in the future are likely to be more expensive.
Therefore, it is recommended that the participation fee not be changed at
this time.
State Emission Reduction Credit Bank
The State Emission Reduction Credit Bank was designated for use for new
or increased gas turbine peaking units. Emission reductions available from
the state bank were available for use for three years. They were obtainable
until September 30, 2001 and are valid until November 1, 2003. The entire
inventory of State Emission Reduction Credits applied to permitting in the
AQMD was 55 pounds per day of PM10 and 1,081 pounds per day of
NOx emission reductions. Of those, 761 pounds per day of NOx credits were
used at RECLAIM facilities, both located in Colton. One non-RECLAIM used the
balance of 55 pounds per day of PM10 and 319 pounds per day of
NOx.
Actual emissions are not yet available for these projects. The projected
emissions in the table represent the maximum potential to emit for the
projects. Peaking units operate only when required by the state electricity
grid. In recent months, the demand for electricity from the peaking units
has been far less than it was during the energy crisis in the summer of
2000, so actual emissions are expected to be significantly less than the
potential to emit. Table II summarizes the distribution of the credits to
the gas peaking turbine projects under this program in 2001.
Table II
State Emission Reduction Credit Bank Activity in 2001
|
Location |
Number of Turbines |
Capacity
(megawatts) |
Estimated Date
of Operation |
Projected Emissions |
State Credits Used |
PM10
(lb/day) |
NOx
(lb/day) |
PM10
(lb/day) |
NOx
(lb/day) |
| Non-RECLAIM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Palm Springs |
3 |
45.0 each |
7/25/01
&
9/10/01 |
201 |
561 |
55 |
319 |
| RECLAIM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Colton (1st
facility) |
4 |
10.5 each |
9/1/01 |
|
318 |
|
381 |
| Colton (2nd
facility) |
4 |
10.5 each |
8/5/01 |
|
318 |
|
381 |
| Total
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
1,081 |
Notes: Use of State Emission Reductions requires a 1.2 to
1.0 offset ratio. The Palm Springs facility used a combination of purchased
ERCs, Priority Reserve credits, and State bank credits to offset their PM10
emissions. They used 319 lb/day available from the State bank to offset
their NOx emissions and were required only to offset emissions for the
partial year they operated in 2001.
Recommendations
Receive and file this report in conjunction with the March 2002 Status
Report on Mobile Source Credit Generation Rules and Annual RECLAIM Audit
Report for 2000 Compliance Year. No change in the RECLAIM Reserve
participation fee is recommended at this time. Subsequent annual program
reviews for Rule 2020 should be incorporated as part of the Annual RECLAIM
Audit.
/ / / |