PROPOSAL:
Execute Contract for Investment Consultant Services
SYNPOSIS:
This action is to award a contract in the sum of $45,783 to Sperry
Capital, Inc. to provide investment consultant services to assist in the
annual update of AQMD’s Investment Policy and Guidelines, advise staff on
short-term investment strategies and to provide investment monitoring and
compliance reporting services.
COMMITTEE:
Administrative, November 10, 2005, Recommended for Approval
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
Award bid to and authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with
Sperry Capital, Inc. for Investment Consultant Services at a cost of
$14,800 for FY 2005-06, $15,260 for FY 2006-07 and $15,723 for FY 2007-08.
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env.
Executive Officer
Background
The Board, based on extensive reviews in
1996 and 2000 of the AQMD treasury management operations and the risk and
benefits associated with investing in a commingled county investment pool,
has directed staff to work with the County of Los Angeles (AQMD Treasurer)
to reallocate a significant portion of its short-term investments from the
County’s commingled Pooled Surplus Investment Portfolio into its
noncommingled Special Purpose Investment Portfolio and into the Local Agency
Investment Fund managed by the State Treasurer. To implement this change in
investment policy, staff utilizes the services of an investment consultant
to assist in the annual update of the AQMD Investment Policy and Guidelines;
advise staff on short-term investment strategies available to the AQMD
through its Treasurer; and provide investment monitoring and reporting
services to the AQMD to ensure compliance with its investment policies. An
RFP for Investment Consultant services was issued on September 9, 2005.
These services are for a period of three years.
Outreach
In accordance with AQMD’s Procurement Policy and
Procedure, a public notice advertising the RFP/RFQ and inviting bids was
published in the following publications:
|
1. |
Antelope Valley Press |
11. |
La Opinion
|
21. |
Rafu Shimpo
|
|
2. |
Black Voice News |
12. |
La Prensa Hispana |
22. |
San Bernardino Sun
|
|
3. |
Chinese Daily News |
13. |
La Voz Publications |
23. |
State of California Contracts |
|
4. |
Desert Sun |
14. |
Los Angeles Daily News |
|
Register |
|
5. |
Eastern Group Publications |
15. |
Los Angeles Sentinel |
24. |
The Daily Breeze |
|
6. |
El Chicano |
16. |
Los Angeles Times |
25. |
The Excelsior
|
|
7. |
El Informador |
17. |
Orange County Register |
26. |
The Signal |
|
8. |
Inland Empire Hispanic News |
18. |
Philippine News |
27. |
Wave Community
Newspapers
|
|
9. |
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin |
19. |
Precinct Reporter |
|
|
|
10. |
Korea Central Daily |
20. |
Press Enterprise
|
|
|
Additionally,
potential bidders may have been notified utilizing the Los Angeles County
MTA Directory of Certified Firms, the Inland Area Opportunity Pages
Ethnic/Women Business & Professional Directory; and AQMD’s own electronic
listing of certified minority vendors. Notice of the RFP/RFQ was
mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority
chambers of commerce and business associations, and placed on the Internet
at AQMD’s Web site (http://www.aqmd.gov).
Information was also available on AQMD’s bidder’s 24-hour telephone message
line (909) 396-2724.
Proposal
A total of twenty-five (25) copies of the
RFP were mailed out. Five bids were received in response to the RFP when
final bidding closed at 2:00 p.m. on October 11, 2005. The proposals were
reviewed by a panel composed of the Manager of Investment for Southern
California Edison, and a Financial Analyst, the Chief Financial Officer and
the Controller from the AQMD; one Asian Pacific Islander and three
Caucasian, two female and two male.
Two of the bids reviewed did not score
high enough in the technical evaluation to be considered. The evaluation
results for the three remaining bidders are:
|
BIDDER |
TECHNICAL
SCORE |
COST
SCORE |
ADDITIONAL
POINTS* |
TOTAL POINTS |
BID
AMOUNT |
OVERALL
RANK |
|
Sperry Capital, Inc. |
64.5 |
30 |
10 |
104.5 |
45,783 |
1 |
|
Fieldman & Rollup |
57.3 |
21 |
0 |
78.3 |
60,000 |
2 |
|
PFM |
63.5 |
14 |
0 |
77.5 |
70,000 |
3 |
* Small Business points
The selection criteria used to rank the
proposals included: understanding the work to be performed;
technical/management approach; contractor qualifications; previous
experience; cost; and Small Business, DVBE, local business designation.
While all three responsive firms were well qualified to perform the required
services, the panel selected the top-scoring firm of Sperry Capital, Inc. to
be recommended to the Board.
Resource Impacts
The total costs, including out-of-pocket
expenses, are $14,800, $15,260, and $15,723 for FYs 2005-06, 2006-07,
2007-08, respectively. This represents a maximum cost for the three-year
period of $45,783. Sufficient funds for the first year of the contract are
included in the FY 2005-06 Budget and will be budgeted for the second and
third years.
/ / / |