PROPOSAL:
Execute Contracts for Natural Gas Refueling Station Infrastructure
SYNOPSIS:
On November 4, 2005, the Board approved the release of an RFP to
solicit proposals to facilitate the expansion of the LNG refueling
infrastructure in the South Coast Air Basin and provide additional
assurances that there will be adequate backup LNG supply during periods of
possible disruption in LNG production or delivery. Three proposals were
received by the closing date. Staff believes that two of the three
proposals qualify for funding as they meet the RFP requirements as well as
provide innovative LNG fueling supplies. This action is to recommend
funding the two proposals for a total amount not to exceed $500,000 from
the Clean Fuels Fund.
COMMITTEE:
Technology, March 31, 2006, Recommended for Approval
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
- Authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with Waste Management’s
USA Waste of California in an amount not to exceed $200,000 from the Clean
Fuels Fund to offset the costs of purchasing and installing a new LNG
storage tank at their LNG fueling station in Long Beach, California.
- Authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with Waste Management’s
USA Waste of California, in an amount not to exceed $300,000 from the
Clean Fuels Fund to offset the costs of purchasing and installing a new
LNG production facility using landfill gas from the Altamont Landfill in
Livermore, California.
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env.
Executive Officer
Background
Over the past few months, there have been several plant/facility
breakdowns that have led to short supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) fuel
for the Southern California area. The shortages have created significant
concerns for public and private fleets that rely on continuous deliveries of
fuel for their day to day operations. Since 2001, there has been a
significant increase in the number of heavy-duty vehicles fueled by LNG and
a number of fleets continue to purchase LNG-fueled vehicles. In addition, a
number of new re-fueling facilities are due to begin operation over the next
18 months. Secure and uninterrupted fuel supplies are essential in order to
maintain a smooth transition to alternative fuels.
At the November 2005 meeting, the Board authorized the release of an RFP
to solicit proposals for facilitation of the local production of LNG fuel;
however, proposed projects located outside of the South Coast district would
be considered if the production of LNG was to be based on renewable fuels
such as landfill gas. Cost-share proposals from qualified LNG refueling
facilities for increasing on-site LNG storage capacity were also solicited.
The minimum amount of additional storage required to be considered was at
least 6,000 gallons. Total amount of funding for the subject RFP was
$500,000.
Proposal
Three proposals were received by January 20, 2006 (the closing date of
the solicitation) totaling $3.72 million in requested funding. All proposals
received in response to RFP #2006-11 were evaluated and scored by a diverse,
technically qualified panel in accordance with criteria contained in the
RFP. The evaluation panel’s technical scores for each proposal are provided
in Attachment A. Two of the three proposals are deemed technically
qualified. Staff recommends funding the two technically qualified new
proposals in the total amount of $500,000.
The RFP was divided into two parts: Scope #1 and Scope #2. Interested
Proposers could bid on each scope independently or on both. The goal of
Scope #1 was to provide cost-share funds to assist Contractors in the
development of an LNG production plant(s) in the SCAQMD. The funding
available under the RFP was designed to offset the capital investment costs
associated with the design, construction and installation of a natural gas
or landfill gas based liquefaction plant. Proposed projects were required to
provide a detailed description of the proposed natural gas liquefaction
technology, feed gas pretreatment, liquefaction process, LNG storage, method
of delivering LNG to vehicle fueling stations in the South Coast Basin, and
project financing. If the project involved landfill gas as the basis for LNG
production, a complete and detailed description of the process and project
financing was required.
The goal of Scope #2 was to provide cost-share funds to assist
Contractors in installing new or additional LNG storage either at their own
re-fueling facility or at another site in a cooperative purchasing
agreement. Applicants for both Scope #1 and Scope #2 could include public
agencies or private entities. Cost-share participants could also include
state and local governments, local natural gas providers, manufacturers of
natural gas liquefaction systems, LNG suppliers, LNG marketers, and end
users of the LNG fuel.
Total AQMD funding available for the RFP for both Scope #1 and Scope #2
was $500,000. These funds were available as cost-share funds for the
development of a gas liquefaction plant, additional LNG storage, or both
within the SCAQMD (or outside if renewables are used to make the LNG).
As mentioned above, three proposals were received by the RFP deadline of
January 20, 2006. All proposals were evaluated and scored by a diverse,
technically qualified panel in accordance with criteria contained in the
RFP. The evaluation panel’s technical scores for each proposal are provided
in Attachment A. Two of the three proposals are deemed technically
qualified. Staff recommends funding the two technically qualified new
proposals in the amount of $500,000. In addition to the existing fueling
network and LNG fuel provider, these projects’ facilities will help reduce
current LNG shortages.
Table 1. Projects Proposed to be Funded
| Applicant |
Funding Proposed |
| Waste Management - USA Waste of California (Scope 1) |
$300,000 |
| Waste Management - USA Waste of California (Scope 2) |
$200,000 |
|
TOTAL |
$500,000 |
Waste Management - USA Waste of California
USA Waste of California is proposing to construct an LNG production
facility based on renewable fuels from landfill gas exceeding the minimum
capacity of 6,000 gallons per day. The proposed site is the Altamont
Landfill in Livermore, California. It is owned and operated by Waste
Management. The facility will produce 12,400 gallons per day of LNG for
heavy-duty trucks. The facility also includes a 30,000-gallon storage tank
as well as a new public access fueling station for LNG-powered fleets in the
Bay Area. Approximately 90 percent of the LNG produced will effectively be
utilized as fuel by Waste Management Inc. (WMI) heavy-duty refuse trucks
operating in the SCAQMD. WMI is planning on installing a second unit in the
South Coast Basin after conducting performance evaluations of the Altamont
unit. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $13 million. Staff
proposes funding in the amount of $300,000.
Waste Management - USA Waste of California
USA Waste of California is proposing to install 16,000 gallons of
additional LNG storage capacity to an existing 16,000 gallons for a total
capacity of 32,000 gallons. The storage capacity will be added to the
existing L.A. Metro Hauling District LNG fueling facility in Long Beach,
California. The total cost of the new storage is estimated to be $440,000.
Staff proposes funding in the amount of $200,000.
Benefits to AQMD
The 2003 AQMP relies on the expedited implementation of advanced
technologies and clean-burning fuels in Southern California to achieve air
quality standards. By constructing more natural gas fueling facilities,
benefits from this project will accrue to all cities and area residents.
Such new construction will provide a coordinated effort, plan for growth of
the overall infrastructure and enable the transition to future hydrogen
refueling infrastructure. There are economies of scale from the extensive
infrastructure being planned and installed, possibly reducing the cost and
making alternative refueling stations more affordable. While having no
direct impact on air emission reductions, new CNG and LCNG stations will
help facilitate the introduction of low-emission, natural gas-fueled
vehicles (NGVs) initially in private and public fleets in the area. Such
increased penetration of NGVs will provide direct emissions reductions of
NOx, VOC, CO, PM, and air toxic compounds throughout the Basin.
Outreach
In accordance with AQMD’s Procurement Policy and Procedure, a public
notice advertising the RFP/RFQ and inviting bids was published in the
following publications:
| 1. |
AntelopeValley Press |
11. |
La Opinion
|
21. |
Rafu Shimpo
|
| 2. |
Black Voice News |
12. |
La Prensa Hispana |
22. |
San Bernardino Sun
|
| 3. |
Chinese Daily News |
13. |
La Voz Publications |
23. |
State of California Contracts
Register |
| 4. |
Desert Sun |
14. |
Los Angeles Daily News |
|
|
| 5. |
Eastern Group Publications |
15. |
Los Angeles Sentinel |
24. |
The Daily Breeze |
| 6. |
El Chicano |
16. |
Los Angeles Times |
25. |
The Excelsior
|
| 7. |
El Informador |
17. |
Orange CountyRegister |
26. |
The Signal |
| 8. |
Inland Empire Hispanic News |
18. |
Philippine News |
27. |
Wave Community Newspapers
|
| 9. |
InlandValley Daily Bulletin |
19. |
Precinct Reporter |
|
|
| 10. |
Korea Central Daily |
20. |
Press Enterprise
|
|
|
Additionally, potential bidders may have been notified utilizing the Los
Angeles County MTA Directory of Certified Firms, the Inland Area Opportunity
Pages Ethnic/Women Business & Professional Directory; and AQMD’s own
electronic listing of certified minority vendors. Notice of the RFP/RFQ was
mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority
chambers of commerce and business associations, and placed on the Internet
at AQMD’s Web site (http://www.aqmd.gov/).
Information was also available on AQMD’s bidder’s 24-hour telephone message
line (909) 396-2724.
In addition to publication in the above-cited publications, over 100
individual RFP notices were mailed to interested businesses and individuals.
Bid Evaluation
Proposals received were evaluated by a diverse, technically qualified
panel in accordance with criteria contained in the attached RFP. The
evaluation panel consisted of a representative from the California Energy
Commission, an independent technical expert, and the AQMD Fleet Rules
Implementation Manager. The panel breakdown was one Asian/Pacific Islander
and two Caucasian; one female and two male. Three proposals were received
with a requested funding totaling $3,720,000. Attachment A provides a
summary of the proposals received, which met the minimum technical scores,
ranked by the scores from the evaluation panel. Both bids which met the
minimum technical standards are being recommended for funding.
Resource Impacts
Funding, in an amount not to exceed $500,000, is proposed to fund the two
recommended proposals shown in Table 1. Funding of $500,000 is from the
Clean Fuels Fund as originally allocated by the Board.
Attachment
A - Evaluation of Proposals RFP #P2006-11
Attachment A
Evaluation of Technically Qualified Proposals Submitted
Under RFP P2006-11
|
APPLICANT |
LOCATION |
WORK SCOPE |
EQUIPMENT COSTS
($)
|
FUNDING PROPOSED
($)
|
TECHNICAL SCORE
(AVG)
|
TOTAL
SCORE
(AVG.)
|
| Waste Management – USA Waste of California |
Altamont Landfill, Livermore |
Scope 1 |
13,000,000 |
300,000 |
63.0 |
93 |
| Waste Management – USA Waste of California |
Long Beach |
Scope 2 |
440,000 |
200,000 |
64.6 |
94.6 |
|
TOTALS |
|
|
13,440,000 |
500,000 |
|
|
|